Anyone who believes that automated materials handling
systems are inflexible has never spoken to Phil Gargula, the facilities
maintenance manager for American Airlines’ baggage handling
operations at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport.
Gargula oversees an operation that handles an average of
20,000 bags a day. The original conveyor and sortation system is still in
operation nearly 20 years after it went live.
Thanks to a
new controls and software system (Jervis B. Webb Co., 248-553-1200,
http://www.jerviswebb.com), Gargula expects to extend the life of the original
equipment another 20 years.
The new controls system is also
providing two much needed lifts to American Airlines.
First, the improved data acquisition capabilities provide
greater tracking and reporting than was possible in the past. That allows
Gargula and his crew to analyze where the bottlenecks are that cause mishandled
bags.
Second, the information collected in Chicago
can now be shared in real time with American’s corporate management
system in Dallas.
That allows American to track a bag across the airline.
“When a bag arrives at another airport, a baggage
handler can enter the bag tag number at a web station and track the bag
throughout the system,” says Gargula. “Before this, we were
strictly a standalone system.”
Facing obsolescence
Next to a safe flight, baggage handling is an
airline’s most important job.
“The Department
of Transportation measures every airline by how many bags per thousand are
mishandled,” says Gargula. “The bar is raised every
day.”
That was one reason American upgraded the
control system at O’Hare. The goal was to implement a system that
could track and report back on what happened to a bag from check-in at the
ticket counter until it was sorted to a “pier” to be loaded
onto a plane. With that information, American could better analyze whether bags
were getting held up at the counter because of new security processes; whether
there was a problem with the scanning system that directs a bag’s
destination; or whether there was a mechanical problem causing the bags not to
sort fast enough.
Obsolescence was the major impediment to
collecting that information. While the original conveyors and sortation devices
were still up to the job, the mainframe computer, PLCs and proprietary control
system that managed the information side of the system were long past their
prime.
“Our biggest concern was that some morning
the baggage handling system wouldn’t start up because we
couldn’t get a part for the computer,” Gargula explains.
Work on a new controls system began in 2000, but was interrupted by the attacks
on the World Trade Center.
The system finally went live on July 15, 2003, after the remaining controls
were replaced and tested.
The implementation took place at
night, after the airport closed. “In effect, we replaced the mind of
the system while the mechanics continued to operate,” Gargula says.
That was accomplished by installing a parallel operating
system at the start of the project. The interim system could communicate with
both the existing PLCs and the new PACs that were being installed. That allowed
the implementation team to do a piece-bypiece replacement of the outdated
controllers with no down time. The implementation team would simply switch back
and forth from the old to new system as wiring and controls were replaced.
“It was less expensive and less disruptive than
replacing the entire conveyor system,” says Gargula. “The
only way to do that would be with a completely new building, which would be
cost prohibitive.”
The result is a combination of
old and new: an existing conveyor system that still does the job, but with new
baggage tracking, data collection and reporting capabilities thanks to state of
the art controls. Those include hot control backup hardware in the event of a
shutdown, and a live graph Graphical representation of the system that
wasn’t possible with the old controllers.
Tracking bags
When a passenger checks in at the ticket counter, American
Airline’s central host computer in Dallas generates information to
create a baggage tag with a 10- digit bar code number. The tag, which is just
like the license plate bar code on a pallet, is printed and applied to the bag.
The host computer then sends a BSM, or baggage sortation
message, to the baggage handling computer at O’Hare. The BSM contains
the flight information associated with the bar code number on the bag tag,
including the location of the sortation pier assigned to that outbound flight.
That determines the route that bag will take throughout the fulfillment cycle.
From the ticket counter, bags first pass through the
baggage screening system operated by the Transportation Security
Administration. Then it is placed on American’s takeaway conveyor.
Behind
the ticket counter, the bag passes through a scanner array equipped with
multiple read heads capable of reading a bag from almost any angle.
When the tag is scanned, the system looks up the flight
information associated with that bag in the local database and determines how
to sort the bag.
Photo eyes and programmable controller
logic now track the bag until it reaches the sortation area. There a pusher
diverter sorts it onto the chute that will deliver it to the right pier. A
typical trip takes about 8 minutes from the ticket counter to the sort piers.
From the sortation pier, bags are removed by hand, placed
on carts, and delivered to the airplanes.
If a tag can’t be
read at the scanner array, it is diverted to a re-circulation conveyor. Those
bags are scanned by hand, or the information is entered by manual keypad, and
placed back on the conveyor. If a bag fails both an array scan and a hand scan,
it automatically goes to a default pier where it can be handled manually.
Operators look up the flight information and deliver the bag by hand to the
right pier.
Eliminating
bottlenecks
One key goal was to reduce the
number of bags that go to the re-circulation area.
The
system records the time and date when a bag is checked in at the ticket counter
into a bag history database. Time and date information is also captured when a
bag is scanned at the scanner array and when it is diverted at the sort pier.
That allows American to measure how long it took the bag to reach each of those
important milestones.
“With better tracking, we
can now begin to identify, measure and eliminate baggage processing
bottlenecks,” says Gargula.
That information is
also used to trace bags globally. As the bags move through the system, those
same significant progress steps are relayed in real time to the airline host
system through a bag processed message, or BPM.
The airline
host computer maintains a database of the steps and progress of all bags for
tracking purposes. Likewise, other baggage systems at other airports report to
the host to provide a beginning-to-end path report.
Beyond
baggage tracking, the new controls also enable American to monitor the
maintenance status of the system. Operators can watch for motor overloads that
could shut down a key segment of conveyor, or for photos eyes that might be out
of alignment, leading to mishandled bags.
“We’re anticipating a 20% reduction in
the number of mishandled bags as a result of the new system, and
we’ve already had several days with no bags that were sorted to the
wrong pier,” says Gargula. “This has allowed us to expand
our system, and extend the life of our system by at least another 20
years.